Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

GIRLS IN LINGERIE!

Thu, 6 July 2000, 12:39 pm
Walter Plinge18 posts in thread
GIRLS IN LINGERIE!
GIRLS IN LINGERIE!
GIRLS IN LINGERIE!
(Jarrad in lingerie?)
GIRLS IN LINGERIE!

Just thought I'd tell you all that I spent the evening with ten gorgeous ladies in lingerie. Now that I've gotten that expected response out of my system...

The traditionally-cold Hackett Hall was unseasonably hot 'n' sweaty last night as the bodies packed in for a midweek performance of "Cabaret". One of the biggest audiences I've ever seen at Playlovers responded with unanimous enthusiasm for this wonderful production.

I've gone on record as saying that I'm not a huge fan of musicals - characterisation and plot development often take a back seat to musical numbers. I'll also readily admit that I know very little about musicals, so, once again, this is all from my limited perspective and ‘unvaluable’ opinion.

However, I enjoyed "Cabaret" from start to finish. All musicals have at least one, big, showstoppinÂ’ number; "Cabaret" had three. The cast and the production did not have a weak link throughout. The musical numbers alternated between intentionally trivial ("Two Ladies") and deeply unsettling ("Tomorrow Belongs to Me"). The mood bounced from erotic to terrifying as the Second Reich made its presence known and felt.

Towards the end of last year, ‘polls of the century’ began to proliferate. One such poll that stayed with me, proclaimed, "The One, Single Person Who Had Most Influenced the 20th Century" was Adolf Hitler. "Cabaret" is an important script because it reminds us to Never Forget. We were frequently reminded of the true horror of the situation by characters’ assertions that, "Things will get better," or, "It doesn’t affect us." Never more chillingly has a line sent shivers down my spine than David Young’s simple, yet heartbreaking, "It’ll pass."

Other things that impressed included the effortless scene changes - an entire lounge suite came on and off in seconds! The on-stage and involved, but never intruding or distracting, orchestra. The ease with which the audience came to like the friendly, amicable Ernst Ludwig, and our revulsion as his political affiliations became apparent. The sheer classiness (if such a thing is possible in the circumstances) of Helen’s Sally Bowles - nice to see Christian Dior lace-top stockings coupled with red suspenders as an effective contrast and counterpoint to the regular hosiery worn by the chorus. The horror of Germany’s descent into evil strikingly portrayed by the gradual deterioration of the Kit Kat Girls. And ‘Bec, I too am thrilled that you finally fulfilled your lifelong dream!

David and Gill - sorry I didn't get the chance to talk to you and congratulate you in person. I was very pleased to see the three main protagonists - all individually diminished by the rise of Nazism - share a well-deserved final curtain call. I donÂ’t usually single people out, but, My God, these performances were GOOD:

Jarrad West - (Hmmm, spellchecker didnÂ’t like THAT spelling.) I remember when he played the Artful Dodger, so now, not only does he make me feel incredibly untalented, but also old. Thanks Jarrad. Thanks a lot.

Gregory Jones - I thoroughly enjoyed his recent performance in "Assassins" and he continued to impress here.

Helen McFarlane - I could watch and listen to Helen for hours. Her accent and characterisation never faltered, her voice reached every corner of the auditorium with seeming impunity, and her movements were graceful, disciplined and sensuous - an amazingly talented lady and one of my favourite actresses in Perth.

Three performances remaining. If you havenÂ’t yet seen it, do so.


JB

Thread (18 posts)

Walter PlingeThu, 6 July 2000, 12:39 pm
GIRLS IN LINGERIE!
GIRLS IN LINGERIE!
GIRLS IN LINGERIE!
(Jarrad in lingerie?)
GIRLS IN LINGERIE!

Just thought I'd tell you all that I spent the evening with ten gorgeous ladies in lingerie. Now that I've gotten that expected response out of my system...

The traditionally-cold Hackett Hall was unseasonably hot 'n' sweaty last night as the bodies packed in for a midweek performance of "Cabaret". One of the biggest audiences I've ever seen at Playlovers responded with unanimous enthusiasm for this wonderful production.

I've gone on record as saying that I'm not a huge fan of musicals - characterisation and plot development often take a back seat to musical numbers. I'll also readily admit that I know very little about musicals, so, once again, this is all from my limited perspective and ‘unvaluable’ opinion.

However, I enjoyed "Cabaret" from start to finish. All musicals have at least one, big, showstoppinÂ’ number; "Cabaret" had three. The cast and the production did not have a weak link throughout. The musical numbers alternated between intentionally trivial ("Two Ladies") and deeply unsettling ("Tomorrow Belongs to Me"). The mood bounced from erotic to terrifying as the Second Reich made its presence known and felt.

Towards the end of last year, ‘polls of the century’ began to proliferate. One such poll that stayed with me, proclaimed, "The One, Single Person Who Had Most Influenced the 20th Century" was Adolf Hitler. "Cabaret" is an important script because it reminds us to Never Forget. We were frequently reminded of the true horror of the situation by characters’ assertions that, "Things will get better," or, "It doesn’t affect us." Never more chillingly has a line sent shivers down my spine than David Young’s simple, yet heartbreaking, "It’ll pass."

Other things that impressed included the effortless scene changes - an entire lounge suite came on and off in seconds! The on-stage and involved, but never intruding or distracting, orchestra. The ease with which the audience came to like the friendly, amicable Ernst Ludwig, and our revulsion as his political affiliations became apparent. The sheer classiness (if such a thing is possible in the circumstances) of Helen’s Sally Bowles - nice to see Christian Dior lace-top stockings coupled with red suspenders as an effective contrast and counterpoint to the regular hosiery worn by the chorus. The horror of Germany’s descent into evil strikingly portrayed by the gradual deterioration of the Kit Kat Girls. And ‘Bec, I too am thrilled that you finally fulfilled your lifelong dream!

David and Gill - sorry I didn't get the chance to talk to you and congratulate you in person. I was very pleased to see the three main protagonists - all individually diminished by the rise of Nazism - share a well-deserved final curtain call. I donÂ’t usually single people out, but, My God, these performances were GOOD:

Jarrad West - (Hmmm, spellchecker didnÂ’t like THAT spelling.) I remember when he played the Artful Dodger, so now, not only does he make me feel incredibly untalented, but also old. Thanks Jarrad. Thanks a lot.

Gregory Jones - I thoroughly enjoyed his recent performance in "Assassins" and he continued to impress here.

Helen McFarlane - I could watch and listen to Helen for hours. Her accent and characterisation never faltered, her voice reached every corner of the auditorium with seeming impunity, and her movements were graceful, disciplined and sensuous - an amazingly talented lady and one of my favourite actresses in Perth.

Three performances remaining. If you havenÂ’t yet seen it, do so.


JB

Walter PlingeThu, 6 July 2000, 07:28 pm

RE: GIRLS IN LINGERIE!

Firstly you can tell if a fully clothed actress (excuse the sexism) is wearing pantihose instead of stockings (Renate in Dolls House) now you can pick the brand of lace top stockings from ten rows back. I am absolutely full of admiration Jarrod. When the ITA runs a workshop on "Perving as an artform" you get my vote to run the masterclass.
P.S. If you give private lessons please e-mail me with prices. No bugger the prices- I'll pay anything!
Walter PlingeFri, 7 July 2000, 08:45 am

RE: GIRLS IN LINGERIE!

Sorry Dean, it's a skill you have to born with.

JB
Leah MaherFri, 7 July 2000, 11:02 am

RE: GIRLS IN LINGERIE!

Drowning.. (gasp) ..in..(splutter).....testosterone....(hack hack)..and (coff).... good..(splutter)... .natured... (sob)..... sexism... (going down for the third time)...!!!!

HELP!!

Walter PlingeFri, 7 July 2000, 12:31 pm

RE: GIRLS IN LINGERIE!

"going down for a third time"!!!! who were the first lucky two???
Walter PlingeFri, 7 July 2000, 01:12 pm

RE: GIRLS IN LINGERIE!

Sure, I'm overflowing with good-natured sexism, but even I'm not touching that one...

JB
Leah MaherFri, 7 July 2000, 01:32 pm

RE: GIRLS IN LINGERIE!

You should try to hide your e-mail origin, NN, it makes it very easy to figure out who you are.

LEAH

PS Anyway it was only one very very lucky person, you should know that!!
Leah MaherFri, 7 July 2000, 02:41 pm

RE: GIRLS IN LINGERIE!

Just to clarify my previous response, I meant IT IS ONLY EVRY ONE VERY VERY LUCKY PERSON!!!

By the way........

naughty naughty wrote:
-------------------------------
"going down for a third time"!!!! who were the first lucky two???

Is that jealousy Mr Naughty, or just professional interest?
Walter PlingeFri, 7 July 2000, 02:46 pm

RE: GIRLS IN LINGERIE!

Is it me, or has this initially fantastic review disintegrated somewhat??
;)

Congrats, Playlovers! Unfortunately and with much regret I won't be able to see the show and I somehow get the feeling I'm missing our on an award-winner........(?)

(big hugs to JW, my Artful Dodger ~ luv, Nancy) xxx
Walter PlingeFri, 7 July 2000, 02:51 pm

RE: GIRLS IN LINGERIE!

Ahem.
That should read "missing OUT on an award-winner".
That's what you get for typing all day....
Walter PlingeFri, 7 July 2000, 03:10 pm

RE: GIRLS IN LINGERIE!

Oh no I forgot dan workes here as well. Sorry with my sic sense of humour i couldn't refuse the "bite"
lotsa love the other spunk in despatch. XXXX

Leah Maher wrote:
-------------------------------
Just to clarify my previous response, I meant IT IS ONLY EVRY ONE VERY VERY LUCKY PERSON!!!

By the way........

naughty naughty wrote:
-------------------------------
"going down for a third time"!!!! who were the first lucky two???

Is that jealousy Mr Naughty, or just professional interest?
Leah MaherFri, 7 July 2000, 03:53 pm

More clarification!

That should say EVER by the way, not EVRY.

ALWAYS PROOF READ, PEOPLE!!
Walter PlingeFri, 7 July 2000, 08:56 pm

RE: GIRLS IN LINGERIE!

I find it sad that an intellectual exchange between myself and the Prez has turned so tacky. Leah, you should be ashamed of yourself ( although I must say it's probably the company you keep).
Walter PlingeSat, 8 July 2000, 01:01 am

RE: GIRLS IN LINGERIE!

HEY??!!!!
You got a smart mouth on you, you no-good punk, Schulze.
Walter PlingeSun, 9 July 2000, 05:07 pm

GIRLS IN LINGERIE! or Cabaret

Wow
Excellent production. Yes the girls and the boys are lovely, sexy etc.
The production was wonderful, acting was great, almost everything was brilliant so please add superlatives to taste.
I thoroughly enjoyed the production and having never seen Cabaret before was pleasantly surprised by a somewhat gritty tale that didnt muck about with too much schmaltz.
Made me think of Clockwork Orange for some reason even though they are completly different genre's.
Gripes
1. Smashing window sound really didnt work too well. I know that it takes timing and stuff to synchronise it all but there you are.
2. The throw away GST line didnt really do anything for me, I mean you guys went to so much trouble to create atmosphere and stuff, it was also a trifle anachronistic.
David and Crew should be proud of themselves because we are proud of you. Bloody well Done.
Walter PlingeMon, 10 July 2000, 03:39 pm

RE: GIRLS IN LINGERIE! or Cabaret

Hi Gary,
Thanks for your kind words. I just wanted to say that the GST line was added in on the last night without the knowledge of the director, choreographer and MD!
Cheers,
Gill
Walter PlingeMon, 10 July 2000, 04:55 pm

RE: GIRLS IN LINGERIE!

I must admit that I came to Playlovers with expectations. I love Cabaret, and when I knew that David was going to base his interpretation on the new Broadway production, I set my sights high to expect a mammoth production.

Happily, I was not let down. :)

Playlovers is to be congratulated by using this production to do a number of things...
-Finally find somewhere to put the band and 'sound them up' properly so as not to drown the singers and/or deafen the audience
-Make back a lot of money that Playlovers had previously invested in productions that were not as successful as Cabaret
-And continue to push the boundries of Community Theatre in Western Australia.

David and his team are also to be commended for the extraordinary amount of work that must have gone into this production. Terry's costumes were again amazing, and all in all I very much appreciated the work that created the performances.

Its always exctitng in Community Theatre to see something new. This was certainly one of those nights!
Walter PlingeMon, 10 July 2000, 06:50 pm

RE: GIRLS IN LINGERIE!

Somehow Jarrad, i CAN'T see you in silver hot pants and a halter...*wink* eheheh

← Back to Theatre Reviews