Directors
Tue, 17 Aug 1999, 10:34 amWalter Plinge9 posts in thread
Directors
Tue, 17 Aug 1999, 10:34 amIt has been my misfortune to find a certain Director has branched out into writing criticism of her fellow actors in a certain newsletter to do witha certain group.Suffice it to say that if I read any more reviews by this person in thenewsletter I will get rather annoyed.I hear that she can actually act although what Anton would have thought I cant tell.Suffice it to say that this person may be able to act but she cannot directtoo over the top. Absolutely no sense of style.Publish and be damnedThe Phantom.
Re: Directors
Wed, 18 Aug 1999, 11:58 amA critical 'FalK' on the 'Lee' side can be 'Shepherd' into a 'Frew' publication - so why can't anyone who have an opinion and state it, even if they are a Director/Actor.I agree with you El...-sorry... Mr Walker.At least the Director in question obviusly had the guts to put their name on it. Unlike the "Ghost who squawks" aka the PHANTOM?I wonder if the posting would have arose if it was a complimentry kissy-kissy-darling shmooze????.......could it have been an honest crit - write on Phantom, show it to us!Joe 'skulling'McCabe> Cool.> That's cool, too.> Ouch...> What I find about interesting about this is a) the director's> gender is specified, and b) The Phantom is sufficiently vexed to scrawl> its disagreement for the world to see.> Publish and be damned perhaps, but if you want the whole Day> Trip to Hades, go the whole hog- that's why this Gossip page exists,> surely... :-o> Mr Walker. (think about it...)
- ···