New Poll - Shot On Site
Thu, 1 July 2004, 11:48 pmcrgwllms11 posts in thread
New Poll - Shot On Site
Thu, 1 July 2004, 11:48 pmNew Poll topic:
A recently contentious issue, and line of discussion, has prompted me to enter this new poll.
What do you think of censorship when it comes to totally offensive, unnecessary posts?
The Poll-tergeist.
[%sig%]
A recently contentious issue, and line of discussion, has prompted me to enter this new poll.
What do you think of censorship when it comes to totally offensive, unnecessary posts?
The Poll-tergeist.
[%sig%]
Re: New Poll - Shot On Site
Fri, 2 July 2004, 12:18 pmcrgwllms wrote:
>
> What do you think of censorship when it comes to totally
> offensive, unnecessary posts?
>
As ever, I ask; who decides? Who's standards do we apply? One persons "totally offensive" is another persons "it wasn't that bad" or "I was only mucking around". One persons "unnecessary" is another persons "you just don't agree with me" or "I think I should be able to air my views".
I notice so far most people have pushed the decisions off on Grant. I have to admit I did too, but I don't know if it's a question any one person has the ability to answer. Sometimes you have to all agree to let one person to decide for everyone, rightly or wrongly. Not a responsibility I would want.
Leah M
>
> What do you think of censorship when it comes to totally
> offensive, unnecessary posts?
>
As ever, I ask; who decides? Who's standards do we apply? One persons "totally offensive" is another persons "it wasn't that bad" or "I was only mucking around". One persons "unnecessary" is another persons "you just don't agree with me" or "I think I should be able to air my views".
I notice so far most people have pushed the decisions off on Grant. I have to admit I did too, but I don't know if it's a question any one person has the ability to answer. Sometimes you have to all agree to let one person to decide for everyone, rightly or wrongly. Not a responsibility I would want.
Leah M