Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

VCA?

Mon, 21 Sept 2009, 03:44 pm
Pokey16 posts in thread
Hi everybody, Like many, I'm planning to try out for acting schools this year. I currently live in Adelaide, and have my Nida audition on the 14th of Nov and my Waapa audition on the 25th of Nov. I wasn't planning to try out for VCA this year, as they are not auditioning in Adelaide, but I've been told that I should. Now I'm conflicted, because in order to audition in Melbourne I'd have to fly to Melbourne the day following my Waapa audition for the last days of VCA auditions. It's not that I'm unwilling, but I question why VCA are not auditioning in all capital cities this year. Nida and Waapa are willing to come to Adelaide, so why not VCA? In addition, I've heard things in the past, from this message board too, about VCA 'culling' a lot of students from their acting courses. Now, granted, that post ( http://www.theatre.asn.au/node/1908 ) was referring to Lindy Davies in particular, who has now resigned from her post. But I wondered if anyone on this board knows whether it's still a common practice? Also, VCA is becoming part of Melbourne University next year. Do you think that will change things? As I said above, I will make the effort to fly to Melbourne, but I'm not sure if I'd want to spend a year at VCA only to be failed or forced to quit without any understanding of why I'm not making the grade. So what do people in the know think about VCA? Is it changing with the removal of Lindy Davies and the connection to Melbourne University?

Clarification

Tue, 29 Sept 2009, 09:14 am

I did wonder if my comment would be misunderstood. It was rather simplified. - I acknowledge that different schools have different teaching practises and policies. I acknowledge that the internal cultural mindset will differ dependant very much on who is teaching and the specific requirements.

My implication that they all have a similar mindset was more to do with the process of auditioning. Each school will have an agenda (and I do not mean this is a negative way) that they hope to achieve. To a very large extent, those who get call-backs and may even be accepted into the school are those hopefuls who at audition best fill the needs of the school at the time. These needs are directed by several factors that may differ from school to school, yet the approach to auditioning is similar in nature.

Some students will be rejected because they are too green, others because they are too ripe. Once you have weened out those you can work with, then you can makes choices based upon more detailed criteria, such as the type of shows they plan to produce.

Why do they do this? Because they, in a real sense, have to. There are so many hopeful applicants that audition for each of these schools every year, thousands, that in order to cull the list down to something they can manage, they will need to get very particular with their selection criteria. It is the nature of the industry itself.

I hope this helps to clarify my comments.

Absit invidia (and DFT :nono:)

Jeff Watkins
SN Profile
Photo Work
"ƃuıʇsǝɹǝʇuı ǝɟıן ƃuıʞɐɯ"

Thread (16 posts)

VCA?Pokey21 Sept 2009
← Back to Green Room Gossip