sex!
Mon, 5 Nov 2001, 10:25 pmRichard37 posts in thread
sex!
Mon, 5 Nov 2001, 10:25 pmHello everyone- i just thought i would call it that so then i could get some interest:0)
I am interested i doing a musical next year and the must i would like to use is popular music of all time- i am asking if anyone can message me back with their most popular music. any kind of music, rock, pop jazz and also musical theatre
thanks heaps
love richard
I am interested i doing a musical next year and the must i would like to use is popular music of all time- i am asking if anyone can message me back with their most popular music. any kind of music, rock, pop jazz and also musical theatre
thanks heaps
love richard
RE: I'm Prouder View
Mon, 26 Nov 2001, 01:48 pmJason Gamble wrote:
-------------------------------
>>"Don't Don't Don't take ME on in an arguement (sic) because u wont like what i say."
Jason, it was because people didn't didn't didn't like what you said that the criticism started in the first place. That it has devolved into this argument is unfortunate, but directly related to your inflammatory reaction to the criticism.
>>"You do not want to argue with me because i argue very dirty."
I do not want to argue with you because you argue very badly.
>>"(Someone has a superiority complex...not me)"
No, I would've guessed the opposite in your case.
>>"Okay i dont know if youre trying to make yourself look big or just make me look stupid"
You've got me there. My initial parody of your words (to which I've previously admitted), and in fact all subsequent conversation with you, has been purely and unashamedly to make myself look big and clever. But yes, my prime motivation is to jest, not to attack you personally.
If you feel that I'M the one responsible for making you look stupid, then I do apologise for any part I contributed to.
It's not personal. I don't know you. It's public. And on a public forum, anyone who posts here does so with the implicit knowledge that strong opinions may be heavily debated, countered, disagreed with, and perhaps ridiculed (or occasionally, agreed with and supported!). I am often trying to stir up such a reaction, partly for my own & others' entertainment, and partly to encourage frank and honest discussions, opinions, criticism and debate.
Like you, I am opposed to censorship of ideas. However, I do always try to maintain a logical, considered argument, without resorting to name calling, poor manners, or profanity. All my attacks are direct responses to words previously written, which I consider fair game.
My words, too, are on display to receive their due criticism, which is why I carefully consider my choice of words BEFORE I post.
>>"now lets talk about THEATRE for smegs sake! GET OVER IT!!!"
Fair comment. I agree. I can sense that others are probably tired of all this nonsense too, so I will put this issue to rest. Hopefully, that will give us both a chance to reflect on how better to communicate in future.
Cheers
Craig
<8>-/====/------------
Be better employed, and be naught awhile!
-------------------------------
>>"Don't Don't Don't take ME on in an arguement (sic) because u wont like what i say."
Jason, it was because people didn't didn't didn't like what you said that the criticism started in the first place. That it has devolved into this argument is unfortunate, but directly related to your inflammatory reaction to the criticism.
>>"You do not want to argue with me because i argue very dirty."
I do not want to argue with you because you argue very badly.
>>"(Someone has a superiority complex...not me)"
No, I would've guessed the opposite in your case.
>>"Okay i dont know if youre trying to make yourself look big or just make me look stupid"
You've got me there. My initial parody of your words (to which I've previously admitted), and in fact all subsequent conversation with you, has been purely and unashamedly to make myself look big and clever. But yes, my prime motivation is to jest, not to attack you personally.
If you feel that I'M the one responsible for making you look stupid, then I do apologise for any part I contributed to.
It's not personal. I don't know you. It's public. And on a public forum, anyone who posts here does so with the implicit knowledge that strong opinions may be heavily debated, countered, disagreed with, and perhaps ridiculed (or occasionally, agreed with and supported!). I am often trying to stir up such a reaction, partly for my own & others' entertainment, and partly to encourage frank and honest discussions, opinions, criticism and debate.
Like you, I am opposed to censorship of ideas. However, I do always try to maintain a logical, considered argument, without resorting to name calling, poor manners, or profanity. All my attacks are direct responses to words previously written, which I consider fair game.
My words, too, are on display to receive their due criticism, which is why I carefully consider my choice of words BEFORE I post.
>>"now lets talk about THEATRE for smegs sake! GET OVER IT!!!"
Fair comment. I agree. I can sense that others are probably tired of all this nonsense too, so I will put this issue to rest. Hopefully, that will give us both a chance to reflect on how better to communicate in future.
Cheers
Craig
<8>-/====/------------
Be better employed, and be naught awhile!
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···