Controversial Egg?
Thu, 30 Apr 2009, 10:07 amclass act theatre20 posts in thread
Controversial Egg?
Thu, 30 Apr 2009, 10:07 amClass Act is in the middle of rehearsing "A Day in the Death of Joe Egg" by Peter Nichols.
This play was listed as being one of the recommended texts for WA high schools.
So far, they are staying away in droves.
Is this 1967 play too controversial for our modern audiences??
We have already had a school ring up and say they were disgusted by our flyer - which quoted a review from The Observer which was on the BACK of the actual text along with a review written in 1993 (we put both on the flyer thinking they were "safe" as they were published with the text!)
The offending review was by Ronald Bryden in 1967 - " This remarkable play is about a nightmare all women must have dreamed at some time, and most men: living with a child born so hopelessly crippled as to be, as the father says in it brutally, "a human parsnip". For all that, it has to be described as a comedy, one of the funniest and most touching I've ever seen."
I must admit that during rehearsals, I am cringing at some of the 1967 references - but because the play is not pc enough for today's standards - should we not perform it??
Should we be changing some of the offensive references? What do you think?
Angelique Malcolm
a tricky one for sure,
Sun, 3 May 2009, 12:58 pma tricky one for sure, however, i would guess that the feedback that you have had from teachers especially, does not identify 'small mindedness' but rather a cautious approach, which i would imagine teachers these days have to exercise. i am not a teacher myself but i do know those who are and it is often the case that their own opinions or tastes have to be compromised in order to appease the preferences of not necessarilly the students but more over the parents. i would imagine the material in this play would offed the morals of (in particular) schools of a religious persuasion whose beliefs contradict those expressed in the play.
it is very easy to dismiss the reaction as samll mindedness when you dont have to consider anyone elses sensebilities but your own, however, they are just responding to the information you have given them, as am i...i just think people jump on the anti pc wagon a little too quickly without considering the context. i think the majority who took that opinion had claimed not to have read the play...therefore they hardly offer intelligent offerings, more just sound bites in response to you considering editing, and they as 'playwrights see that as artisitic butchering (rightly so), although i have to admit i have never read or seen their workings being performed.
im afraid that you have decided to produce a play without the necessary research, in that your target audience has turned its back on you. harsh lesson but proof im sure, that it so important to canvas what audience need especially when it is directed at schools and those in education.
any way good luck.
Is that all there is, if so can we all stop dancing (or something equally as pointless and wacky!)
- ···
- ···