Reviews - Yes or No?
Thu, 9 Aug 2001, 06:39 pmGillian Binks28 posts in thread
Reviews - Yes or No?
Thu, 9 Aug 2001, 06:39 pmI enjoy reading intelligent reviews BUT it seems to have gotten to a stage where those who dare to give an opinion that is less-than-glowing get torched. I used to write exactly what I thought but I now refrain from reviewing shows if it would contain more constructive criticism than compliments. Instead I simply compliment those who (or that which) I felt were stand-outs or keep my mouth shut. I'm sure that I am not the only one who does this as many of the reviews read like hyped-up press releases. I don't believe that all these shows being reviewed can be that flawless.
So my question for discussion is this: Do you want to be reviewed by your peers or do you think "If I wanted his/her opinion I'd have asked for it"?
I personally think that as long as the reviewer isn't just being cruel and spiteful (and preferably is not anonymous) that reviews are good for us. After all, if we don't agree with what someone says about us or our show we can always dismiss the review/reviewer (but then again we may just learn something)!
So my question for discussion is this: Do you want to be reviewed by your peers or do you think "If I wanted his/her opinion I'd have asked for it"?
I personally think that as long as the reviewer isn't just being cruel and spiteful (and preferably is not anonymous) that reviews are good for us. After all, if we don't agree with what someone says about us or our show we can always dismiss the review/reviewer (but then again we may just learn something)!
Oooh look! A can of worms- pass the can opener!
Thu, 16 Aug 2001, 06:57 pmWalter Plinge
Gill wrote:
"I guess it's just that I believe when you go to see an amateur show you can't expect it to be as good as a professional one ....."
And WHY the flame-retardant hell NOT???!!!?!!
Amateur shows may not have the financial backing (although the stories I hear about arts funding make me think different...) of professional shows- BUT!!! That does NOT guarantee the quality of a "pro" show over one where the actors do it for fun.
Yes, yes, we've been down this sticky road before on this site and blood has been shed (some of it by me, and some of it mine too!) about this topic. The main criteria for ANY show subject to reviewing surely is: does it engage its audience, and does it succeed in its purpose???
Eliot
"I guess it's just that I believe when you go to see an amateur show you can't expect it to be as good as a professional one ....."
And WHY the flame-retardant hell NOT???!!!?!!
Amateur shows may not have the financial backing (although the stories I hear about arts funding make me think different...) of professional shows- BUT!!! That does NOT guarantee the quality of a "pro" show over one where the actors do it for fun.
Yes, yes, we've been down this sticky road before on this site and blood has been shed (some of it by me, and some of it mine too!) about this topic. The main criteria for ANY show subject to reviewing surely is: does it engage its audience, and does it succeed in its purpose???
Eliot
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···