Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Is Shakespeare "as boring as bat shit "?

Sun, 9 Nov 2008, 10:00 pm
stinger102 posts in thread
When I was in high school and Shakespeare was compulsory, I used to love the stories (plenty of sex and violence) but hated the language. Why could he have not said the same thing in plain and simple words? And why should we Aussies have to learn about old Pommie poets anyway? When I was at uni in the 70s, I had a small part in the scottish play. I had one long speech to remember. It was most daunting, until it was pointed out to me that it was written in iambic pentameter, so that once the actor got into the rhythm, the actual words just seemed to flow. As I matured, I began to appreciate the whole canon more and more. I realised that Shakespeare had contibuted more to the development of the English language than any other single person (with the possible exception of Chaucer). Moreover, it was not only great literature, but if you could tap into the language, it was great theatre as well. Nowadays, it stikes me that any theatre actor worth his or her salt has done, and yearns to do more Shakespeare, as an important aspect of their artistic development. Not only that, but the plays never seem to lose their audience appeal. Finally, I regard myself as a devotee of Australian dramatic works and historical narratives. I value our national heritage to the point of jingoism. Having said that, I regard Shakespeare as just as much a part of our heritage as Britain's. I therefore categorically disagree with the above proposition.

Worthless Old Salt

Sun, 9 Nov 2008, 11:20 pm

I certainly see why you would hold those views about Shakespeare Peter, but my view differs, in that I studied Latin for five years (as a lawyer of a similar age, I suspect you also may have practised the odd declension or two) and that, combined with my love of Greek mythology colours my viewpoint on our language origins and rollicking good tales.

I willingly bow to the fact that I may not be worth my salt as an actor - I have no wish / desire / yearning to do Shakespeare as part of my artistic development, although you are quite right in stating the Bard is part of our heritage, it’s just that I find people such as David Williamson, Tim Winton and Leonard Cohen (the later two not playwrights) infinitely more interesting in terms of capturing the dilemmas of the world in which I live, which takes nothing away from Shakespeare, or his contribution to the English language.

There is of course, no right or wrong, it's just personal choice, although I have permitted myself to smile, at some who posted after my review. I don't know if they are, however they may well be earnest lovers of Shakespeare, perhaps looking to advance their artistic development, yet one or two seemed incapable of understanding the English language, completely missing the fact that my advice to people was to go and see the play ( Laughing Matter) for the skill of the director, her cast and crew, all of whom were excellent.

It really does prove the need for a good director, when he or she may well be confronted with actors who can't understand the words written in front of them. All the Shakespeare plays in the world won't help them, but some core remedial English education may. Of course, to add a Shakespearean twist, there is the possibility that some were being deliberately obtuse

All Good Things

Greg Ross

Minister for Good Times

Thread (102 posts)

← Back to Green Room Gossip