Modern Plays Not Modern Enough?
Thu, 2 Aug 2001, 12:35 pmGambler14 posts in thread
Modern Plays Not Modern Enough?
Thu, 2 Aug 2001, 12:35 pmIn the movie cinema we're seeing the most modern characters, plots, settings, costumes and effects. Why then is it that modern theatrical pieces are either old plays modernised or new plays based in old times. The only times i have seen a completely modern performance is back in high school (the past 5 years) when we were told to make a five minute improvisation. Why then can't we turn the concepts of a modern five minute impro into a full length play (I'm at the moment writing one so i'm not a hypocrite). I'm involved in Roleystone theatre only because of the people there because roleystone does nothing but old tripe. The newest play roleystone has done is COSI in which i was involved. It was a great play but it was the set in the 70's. We are in the new millenium now and it contains more issues and concepts to base a play on than any period in history, so why can we not use them in plays today? Comments?
RE: Modern Plays Not Modern Enough?
Thu, 2 Aug 2001, 01:35 pmI absolutely agree with you. It is also probably because Roleystone theatre is run mostly but people aged 50-60, maybe older (no offence to any on the committee). They're the ones that put on half of the plays and agree on the production of other ones. Don't get me wrong - I love the old classics but for once I would like to see something new (1990's even) that others have not seen. It might even be interesting.
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···