Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Vocabulary for Kids Plays

Fri, 17 Oct 2008, 02:03 am
crgwllms5 posts in thread
On a recent post a comment was made that young kids might have trouble with large & difficult words written into a play for young people. The play in the example was 'Gogofish' by Damon Lockwood, which has just finished its season at Barking Gecko (and will be coming back in mid 2009, folks!). It referred to lots of odd-sounding names of fossils and extinct creatures....brachiopods, onychodus, placoderms, concavicarids, etc. So yes, you'd be fair to think that young primary school aged kids would not have such words in their vocabulary. But that's not a reason to believe they won't understand if you explain it to them. A kid's brain is an amazing sponge. If the information is presented in the right way, they are perfectly capable of learning a new word instantly. In their first years at school, kids are probably learning 10 or more new words every day. How many new words did YOU learn today? So in the context of a show, saying, 'I am an Onychodus, a large eel-like creature with sharp teeth..." is no different to explaining any other word...'this is a xylophone. you hit the metal bars to play different notes'. We might assume that Onychodus is a much more 'adult vocabulary' word than xylophone, but the fact is that the kids will take no more or less time to learn it than any other new word. I know this from talking to kids after a show, when they will refer to words and names that I'm pretty sure they'd encountered for the first time while watching the performance. And of course, this applies to words from any show, not simply the one in this example. Some of the best examples are the lyrics from Disney movies...many of them are extremely sophisticated, and loved by kids of all ages because of it. The lyricists know there's no need to dumb it down. It's us adults, with our heads already full of thousands of useless things, that are the ones that have trouble learning one or two new words. Don't make the mistake of transferring that difficulty to kids who are well-practised at hearing things they may not have heard before but quickly making sense of it. The point of this little lesson is to discourage any notion of 'playing down' the language in entertainment for kids. I've spent a long time performing in shows for kids (and distinctly remember being a kid who understood more than most adults around me gave me credit for), and the one thing I recommend never to do is to condescend. If anything, make it too challenging - you'll probably find that 80% of the audience will rise to the challenge. That's not to say that we don't 'pitch' a play to specific target age-groups...but that is more to do with the emotional level, or the age and experience of the characters in the play that we want our audience to relate to. There is a certain maturity needed to deal with some conceptual and stylistic themes, and obviously it serves no purpose to 'use big words' if there is no context to help it make sense...this is the craft of a skillful writer, to be able to construct the language in a way so it serves the play and can be understood by your intended audience. But by realising that you still CAN use big words, the play gains so much more potential - to entertain both kids and adults, to educate and inform, and ultimately to fully serve the story you're trying to tell. Cheers, Craig ~<8>-/=====\------

Thread (5 posts)

crgwllmsFri, 17 Oct 2008, 02:03 am
On a recent post a comment was made that young kids might have trouble with large & difficult words written into a play for young people. The play in the example was 'Gogofish' by Damon Lockwood, which has just finished its season at Barking Gecko (and will be coming back in mid 2009, folks!). It referred to lots of odd-sounding names of fossils and extinct creatures....brachiopods, onychodus, placoderms, concavicarids, etc. So yes, you'd be fair to think that young primary school aged kids would not have such words in their vocabulary. But that's not a reason to believe they won't understand if you explain it to them. A kid's brain is an amazing sponge. If the information is presented in the right way, they are perfectly capable of learning a new word instantly. In their first years at school, kids are probably learning 10 or more new words every day. How many new words did YOU learn today? So in the context of a show, saying, 'I am an Onychodus, a large eel-like creature with sharp teeth..." is no different to explaining any other word...'this is a xylophone. you hit the metal bars to play different notes'. We might assume that Onychodus is a much more 'adult vocabulary' word than xylophone, but the fact is that the kids will take no more or less time to learn it than any other new word. I know this from talking to kids after a show, when they will refer to words and names that I'm pretty sure they'd encountered for the first time while watching the performance. And of course, this applies to words from any show, not simply the one in this example. Some of the best examples are the lyrics from Disney movies...many of them are extremely sophisticated, and loved by kids of all ages because of it. The lyricists know there's no need to dumb it down. It's us adults, with our heads already full of thousands of useless things, that are the ones that have trouble learning one or two new words. Don't make the mistake of transferring that difficulty to kids who are well-practised at hearing things they may not have heard before but quickly making sense of it. The point of this little lesson is to discourage any notion of 'playing down' the language in entertainment for kids. I've spent a long time performing in shows for kids (and distinctly remember being a kid who understood more than most adults around me gave me credit for), and the one thing I recommend never to do is to condescend. If anything, make it too challenging - you'll probably find that 80% of the audience will rise to the challenge. That's not to say that we don't 'pitch' a play to specific target age-groups...but that is more to do with the emotional level, or the age and experience of the characters in the play that we want our audience to relate to. There is a certain maturity needed to deal with some conceptual and stylistic themes, and obviously it serves no purpose to 'use big words' if there is no context to help it make sense...this is the craft of a skillful writer, to be able to construct the language in a way so it serves the play and can be understood by your intended audience. But by realising that you still CAN use big words, the play gains so much more potential - to entertain both kids and adults, to educate and inform, and ultimately to fully serve the story you're trying to tell. Cheers, Craig ~<8>-/=====\------
crgwllmsSun, 19 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm

Not Suitable for Children

As an addition to the above, aimed particularly at hopeful writers: Occasionally writers will submit scripts to Barking Gecko, hoping for an opportunity to be produced. The most common problem with many of these scripts is that they are (often unintentionally) pitched to be performed BY children, not by skilled performers FOR children. The language and concepts can therefore appear childish, ignoring the points I bring up in my post above. Remember that popular soapies on TV are pitched (at a language level) at about a Grade Three level. While their content is sometimes questionable, the language is at a general standard. Another problem is that even if yours is a good story, stylistically it may appear rather uninteresting theatrically. I recommend seeing examples of what is currently being professionally produced to get an idea of what is likely to be required, so you can fully exploit the theatrical potential when writing your script. A major difference between getting a piece commissioned professionally as opposed to being produced by an amateur company is in the number of actors required to perform it. Usually 2 or 3, hardly ever more than 4. How you utilise character doubling, and how costume & set changes or other effects can be carried out by the available cast, are major factors to consider. A lot of work goes into script development on submissions before they are ever produced. This begins at concept/synopsis stage, and goes through many draft stages. Scripts with the most potential are usually put through a workshop stage, read by actors, and given criticism and feedback, before going on to final draft stage and production. If this has not yet discouraged you, bear in mind that Barking Gecko produces more new works each year than most other local companies, and supports Western Australian writers. Submissions are always welcome, although I'd suggest discussing your proposal before sending unsolicited scripts. Cheers, Craig ~<8>-/====\---------
Freddie BadgerySun, 19 Oct 2008, 06:24 pm

Kids know harder words than most adults...

Listen to any school kid rattle off the names of their favourite dinosaurs- it's amazing! Kudos to Barking Gecko for putting on a show that doesn't talk down to kids... at ANY level. freddie the rocking jedi badger
TaureanSun, 19 Oct 2008, 06:47 pm

Praise where praise is due...

Great work Barking Gecko, and of course the talented cast of "Gogofish". Despite being aimed at "kids" it still had "adult" appeal... Well done.

(Psssst..Just one slight point though Craig.... Xylophones are made of wood, but we get your drift.) :)

"Be nice to your Tech's - or they'll turn out the lights and go home!"

crgwllmsMon, 20 Oct 2008, 12:31 am

Xylohead

Thanks Taurean. See - as a kid I was so proud of learning a big word, it stuck with me until this day. Of course the whole theory falls down if you give the kid a wrong definition of the word. Where I'd been led to believe that any instrument of that type was called a xylophone, a quick search tells me that the prefix 'xylo' means 'wood'. So the metal one I used to play in school was really a metallophone ...and look, I've just learnt a new word! Cheers, Craig ~<8>-/====\---------
← Back to Green Room Gossip