Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Reviewing people you know

Tue, 27 Nov 2007, 12:04 pm
DazzaB30 posts in thread
Hey Everyone, I've got a question that I would like some opinions on. I have recently written a review of a show that I saw. Quite a few of my friends were in the show and my review has been questioned because I know some of the people involved. (My review is located in this thread if you want to read it - http://www.theatre.asn.au/theatre_reviews/paris ) My situation however is that I live in a relatively small community and therefore I know quite a few of the people invovled in theatre around here. As such, it's difficult for me to find a show in this area that doesn't have at least a couple people that I know in it. My question is then this: Is a person incapable of writing a balanced, un-biassed, constructive review of a show that involves one or more of that person's friends? I personally don't think this is the case. Quite often my friends ask me for my opinion because they know I will tell them honestly. I do hold to a philosphy that there is no point in being mean when giving feedback - all that does is shatter confidence. BUT I will always be honest, and if this means telling someone (including friends) that I didn't think some work they did was good, I will, however I will focus on how to improve that aspect as opposed to just saying it was bad. Is that biassed? I personally don't think so, but I would love to hear what other people have to say on the matter. Hoping to get lots of feedback Darren

Reviews

Wed, 28 Nov 2007, 10:02 am
Walter Plinge
In community theatre, the cast and the audience are largely from the same community and so it is inevitable that at least half the audience know someone in the cast. With that in mind, there are very few people in the audience who have an objective eye, but more importantly, very few that WANT and objective eye. Many enjoy the show BECAUSE they know someone in it, and after all, does it really matter why they enjoy it as long as they do? It is probably best not to take any gushing praise seriously - it is mostly subjective. It is also best not to take any sharp criticism too seriously - it is almost certainly someone with a chip or a gripe since well balanced, happy people simply cannot be bothered finding the time to denigrate others. So somewhere between lies the truth. Most of the reviews I read contain valid and useful criticism and enough encouragement to recognize the effort that goes into any production at any scale. In many cases, it will point to things that the cast and crew are aware of and are trying to fix, but sometimes it is a fresh eye on something that had not been considered. In any case, constructive criticism is always welcome. Personal abuse should be filtered off this site, firstly because it is nothing more that cyberbullying - no different to the type which has been a problem with school children ( and probably by people with about the same mentality ) but also because it is useless to anyone and quickly causes a review site to degenerate into a "review of the review" page. Most pages have a moderator who should filter out the spiteful reviews - they are not hard to pick. Just a quick note re Tohrukuns "get singing lessons" comment - I think it was meant in a constructive fashion - that improving his singing would round off his performance - and was taken as such by the performer who has fought against the fact that he is an almost pathologically happy, considerate and smiling person who has to play a vile, ruthless villain. Of all the performances in the show, I think our cast as a group are most proud of Russell's performance because he is absolutely unrecognizable from himself when he is in character. There you go - a subjective review can also be valuable if you know how far the person has changed their persona to play a character!

Thread (30 posts)

← Back to Green Room Gossip