New site up!

Dear all

It's getting late and there are bound to be a few bugs hanging around but i think we're finally up and running again.

Hope you enjoy!

Cheers
Grant

Thou pribbling tickle-brained wagtail!

[%sig%]

And it looks great! Well done, Grant. All it needs now are some "For..." pages, an FAQ, pictures, etc etc....

8-)

Pamela.

Thou errant weather-bitten haggard!

[%sig%]

Congrats. Looking good.

Thou dissembling plume-plucked barnacle!

[%sig%]

It is marvellous to our eyes!

And he's put in a preview button! Hurrah!

Let's just check...

Thou puny clay-brained barnacle!

Yes - all in working order. Well done Grant!

[%sig%]

Yay Grant! Excellent facelift. Congratulations.

[%sig%]

Hi Grant,

The new site looks FANTASTIC. One problem though is that we who receive posts by email are not receiving anything. (Unless the site has just decided to banish me.... and in that case ...fair enough.)

Kim



Thou venomed elf-skinned foot-licker!

Looks great!

Pisses on the old one!

Hi Kim

Kimberley Shaw wrote:
> The new site looks FANTASTIC.

The response to this change has been notably more positive than when i made the switch to the orange design two years ago

:-)

> One problem though is that we
> who receive posts by email are not receiving anything.
> (Unless the site has just decided to banish me.... and in
> that case ...fair enough.)

As we discussed in the Chat Room, i think everything is okay with mailing out to subscribers. Do let me know if you continue to have trouble. Anyone else suffering the same fate as Kim?

Cheers
Grant

[%sig%]

It's no biggie, but I don't get signatures on posts that I get through my email. It just means I have to make a little more effort to find out who wrote the message.

And please advise - does the attachment doo-dad work both on the site and through the listserv? It looks terribly exciting...but why are there two attachment fields?

[%sig%]

i like it - it's, um, good. no really, i like it.

i found everything a bit hard to find (!?!? - make sense of that one!)

glad to see my favourite insult button is still here.......



Thou bootless reeling-ripe flax-wench! (ooooo - thats a good one)

[%sig%]

Uh, just one thing to point out, the State function in What's On and Auditions have disappeared making it quite difficult to figure out which audition is for which state. I hope this is something that hasn't got the chop.

It's... interesting.

[%sig%]

I'll handle this one for you Grant... ;-)

Alan, this got me for a little while too, HOWEVER:

If you go to the left hand margin in both 'What's On' and 'Auditions' (not to mention every other location in this very attractive site), you'll see a 'Select State' option. He's just generalised it across every page in the frames (including the home page) rather than putting a special button on certain pages.

Very clever.

[%sig%]

Hi Alan

(step aside Pandy, he's all mine!)

Alan Gill wrote:
> Uh, just one thing to point out, the State function in What's
> On and Auditions have disappeared making it quite difficult
> to figure out which audition is for which state. I hope this
> is something that hasn't got the chop.

Your wish is my wossname. The state should have still appeared in both lists but had dropped off.

It's back!

> It's... interesting.

ouch! damned with faint praise

That'll be two stars and an insult for you

;-)

Cheers
Grant

PS. better answer Amanda's post now!

Thou loggerheaded boil-brained nut-hook!

[%sig%]

Hi Amanda

Amanda Chesterton wrote:
> It's no biggie, but I don't get signatures on posts that I
> get through my email. It just means I have to make a little
> more effort to find out who wrote the message.

er... that's why messages to the mailing list now feature the person posting as the "Sender".

:-)

I deliberately left out sigs from the mail to try and keep the mail traffic down. Should i drop them in again?

> And please advise - does the attachment doo-dad work both on
> the site and through the listserv? It looks terribly
> exciting...but why are there two attachment fields?

Not quite that exciting. It will only upload the attachments to the website. They're then available as clickable links in the message.

I've attached pictures of Sharon and I to give you an idea.

:-)

Cheers
Grant

[%sig%]

Who wrote this message:
----------------------------------------------
Author: Lynnette Beedeison (---.connect.com.au)
Date: 08-04-02 10:47

Looks great!

Pisses on the old one!

-----------------------------------------------
Coz it definatly wasnt me!!!!!
Lynnette Beedeison

Hi Lynnette

Lynnette wrote:
>
> Who wrote this message:
> ----------------------------------------------
> Coz it definatly wasnt me!!!!!
> Lynnette Beedeison

I'm afraid that'll be my fault.

:-\

There _was_ a bug that attributed posts incorrectly. You should find it corrected now.

My apologies to all concerned.

Cheers
Grant

[%sig%]