Who is voting down the posts?
Thu, 7 Aug 2008, 08:45 amjmuzz30 posts in thread
Who is voting down the posts?
Thu, 7 Aug 2008, 08:45 amI've already commented in a particular thread but I'm raising this as a general question - has anyone else noticed recently that there are certain posts that, whilst they may hold unpopular opinions, are not in any other way derrogatory and yet they appear to have been arbitrarily voted down?
Am I jumping at shadows here?
Is there a little self-appointed censorship gang out there?
In my opinion, someone or someones are flaunting the spirit of the website and censoring posts they happen to disagree with.
If you're not a little more careful I will vote up at my discretion that which you've voted down.
Whilst I hate the trolls I believe we should be seen to be democracy in action and my fear is someone is trying the autocratic approach. I have no trouble with voting down posts which villify, mock, or are just plain offensive but what I'm seeing goes beyond that.
It makes me angry.....you wouldn't like me when I'm angry (sorry, couldn't resist the last bit).
Anyone care to 'fess up?
Here here
Thu, 7 Aug 2008, 04:24 pm....that's the point I'm making. Vote judiciously before hitting the "rubbish" button. I myself had a hand in binning a comment aimed squarely at Kristen Twynan-Perkins a couple of weeks back. I don't know Kristen personally but I felt the post had no merit and was basically name calling for want of a better word. That's the type of post we don't need but having read the post that commented on Peter, I thought the gist of it was that it was framed as advice for Peter. He didn't like being labelled arrogant (which I can understand) so it had a certain bluntness but I think it was meant to be constructive in its own way.
I've said it once and I'll say it again....."why can't we all just get along".