Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

To Review, Or Not To Review

Tue, 5 Aug 2008, 06:00 pm
Greg Ross20 posts in thread

The comments on reviews have been interesting. I find myself in total agreement with Stinger, in that there is NO place for an anonymous review – if you can’t put your name to what you’ve written, it ain’t worth the screen it appears on.

I believe anonymous reviews should be banned from the Theatre Australia website – if it’s good enough for writers, directors and actors to put themselves out in the public arena for comment (good or bad), then the same MUST apply to any critics, or there is no credibility.

A point made a few days back, was the question of reviews being necessary. Absolutely, a critique of one’s work, whatever field of endeavour one pursues, can be a major and instructive force in the learning curve. Of course, it can also be destructive, if one has trouble accepting criticism (personal attacks are another thing altogether).

It is important for theatre companies and directors to consider the now substantial cost of a night out at any of our community theatres. Admittedly one doesn’t have to order a meal at a nearby café or pub, however many of us do and a number of community theatres recommend establishments, indeed often they have arrangements with the restaurants / hotels. Consequently, I am finding that a night out at community theatre costs around $115.00, made up as follows:

Tickets x 2: $40.00

Fuel: $5.00

Café meal x 2: $60.00

Drinks at theatre: $5.00

Raffle Tickets” $5.00

Total cost: $115.00

Once you start talking those sorts of figures, amateur theatre is in competition with all sorts of entertainment, it’s therefore vital for the long term survival of any theatre group to ensure they put on as good a production as possible.

All Good Things

Greg Ross

One of the issues is that a

Wed, 6 Aug 2008, 11:42 am
One of the issues is that a large number of people respond to negative reviews, even well reasoned ones, as attacks on them personally. I think it may have affected the willingness of some people to post reviews at all leaving only the "Trolls" to launch personal attacks. Three recent cases come to mind, "Ghosts", "Errol Flynn" and the "Winter Warmers". In all three cases negative reviews were published. Mostly these reviews made some attempt at critical analysis and all were attacked by people involved with the productions. It would make you feel, "what's the point" and not bother again. I read pretty much all the reviews posted here even though I can never go to any of the productions. It helps me learn about plays that I may not have read or seen and it keeps me posted on theatre in a different state. I'm sorry that no one seems to review Adelaide Theatre here. OK I don't either, but I actually don't see much that I'm not involved in. edit: I have had it pointed out that I was wrong about the Errol Flynn thread and I would like to apologise. No member of the production attacked the reviewer. My memory was faulty. I still however suggest that the reviewer did make some attempt to make a supported critical analysis of the show. Is that all there is? Well if that's all there is my friend, then let's keep dancing. www.tonymoore.id.au

Thread (20 posts)

← Back to Billboard Bulletins