Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Theatre Lost according to Playwright

Mon, 17 July 2006, 02:56 pm
Labrug25 posts in thread

I read a short yet interesting article in the West Australian this Sat just gone (15th July). The peice was written by Mark Naglazas and without his direct permission, I will quote portions of his work.

A leading Australian playwright, David Williamson, has expressed his concerns over the fate of new Australian theatre at a conference of the Australian National Playwrights in Perth last week. He makes the claim that "if he was starting out today he would probably not be as successful because of the lack of support for new local writing." Subsidies that were once up to half of a theatrical company's budget have seen reductions to less than 10%. With this drop, there is less support for newly emerging playwrights as companies revert to industry proven productions to maintain turnover figures.

"There's lots of wonderful new writing out there but companies don't want to take the risk," sais Williamson. "Young writers can still get their work on in small theatres. The problem is getting that work presented on the main stages."

This is something that has been dicussed occasionally (and recently) on this site. While the truth is a sad situation, it is good to know that this feeling is not isolated to playwrights themselves. I recently posted an article relating to a politcal statement made by the NSW Minster for Arts which expressed similar concerns over theatre in general. You can find that article through this link - http://www.theatre.asn.au/billboard_bulletins/the_state_of_theatre_the_politicians_view

While the apparant RISK of new productions remains financially high, new works and new playwrights will be facing an uphill battle for recognition. As Williamson says, "We are now a film and television culture which is a shame because theatre can do things other dramatic forms can't." How true.

I've been thinking.

Sun, 23 July 2006, 03:54 pm
Even though it hurts. The seven basic plot thing seems dreadfully simplistic. Most modern literature is based on Indo European myth for it's basic concept threads. So we have the quest thread best exemplified by Lord Of The Rings if you've never read Beowolf. Much literature especially most sci fi and fantasy is quest. The love story in all it's basic styles, all of which contain the concept that true love never runs smooth (lets face it there's no theatre without conflict, true of most literature). There are heroic stories of striving aganst odds (Seven Samurai) I give up. The point I'm making is that the seven plots (which might have been in Aristotles Tragedy I don't remember and currently have no copy) are very very basic and talk about mankinds (please accept this as inclusive for the sake of the exercise ladies.) striving. We as writers take those basic problems, The yearning for love, the striving for fame and power, the challenging of the gods, whatever and give it a spin that fits our society and our literate needs. There are many new plots out there and not all of them rehash Hollywood and it's not just spin or twist that makes them new. We need to strive above all else for honesty in our writing. Knowledge of what we are writing about and understanding of the human condition that our plot rises from. I'm getting a headache. enough for now. Life's too short to stuff a mushroom www.tonymoore.id.au

Thread (25 posts)

← Back to Billboard Bulletins